The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 06 @ 20:35:47 CDT
I get an error compiling on Fedora Core :/

Compiling AddFriend.cpp...
In file included from Preferences.h:28,
from ListenSocket.h:27,
from updownclient.h:27,
from Friend.h:25,
from AddFriend.h:25,
from AddFriend.cpp:31:
mfc.h:46:18: glib.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [AddFriend.o] Error 1

on my fedora box, glib.h is under /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h...



Severe trouble compiling the source (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 07 @ 09:02:30 CDT
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/andre/xmule-1.8.1/src/wx/xrc'
Compiling AddFriend.cpp...
In file included from ListenSocket.h:27,
from updownclient.h:27,
from Friend.h:25,
from AddFriend.h:25,
from AddFriend.cpp:31:
Preferences.h: In member function `CString CPreferences::GetIRCNick()':
Preferences.h:484: error: no matching function for call to `CString::CString(
char[30])'
mfc.h:366: error: candidates are: CString::CString(const CString&)
mfc.h:351: error: CString::CString(const wxChar*)
mfc.h:349: error: CString::CString(wxChar*)
mfc.h:347: error: CString::CString()
Preferences.h: In member function `CString CPreferences::GetIRCServer()':
Preferences.h:486: error: no matching function for call to `CString::CString(
char[50])'


any ideas how to solve this?



Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 07 @ 12:50:04 CDT
Horrible. Not getting even 10% of the sources, no downloads, slow gui, worst version i ever tried.

Seems xmule goes worse on every version, even worse since hope don't code it.



About xMule, and the last survey... (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 07 @ 21:19:54 CDT
XMule is... good software. At least in version 1.7.4c, as the 1.8.0 I tried was quite crappy... Well even with that I do prefer it to aMule... No troll, just a personal opinion. And HopeSeekr/Un-Thesis/Ted Smith, you are, if not a good man (Not knowing you, I have simply no opinion about this), a quite good programmer.
What I wanted to post was about the last survey... If I want what ? Unicode, theming, redesign...? Not all of that crap. I would want an complete ABANDON of WX. Why ? Just because more layers means more potential for bugs. A chain is as strong as the weakest link, and while you cannot control the quality of the links, you can minimize the number of them. Stability is the most evident problem in both aMule and xMule. Another advantage of abadonning an unuseful layer would be about software speed : to see a p2p application eat my CPU and my RAM is quite... irritating.
Hoping that, if you, HopeSeekr leave the project you will be replaced by quality developers. Thank you for your job.

PS : excuse my english, I am french.



Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 07 @ 23:20:10 CDT
I try this with Gentoo and it failed. I copy the xmule-1.8.0 to /usr/local/portage overlay and edit the ebuilt to point to xmule-1.8.1 tarball. It failed with the errors below.

ClientDetailDialog.cpp:54: error: invalid static_cast from type `void
(CClientDetailDialog::*)(wxEvent&)' to type `void
(wxEvtHandler::*)(wxCommandEvent&)'
make[1]: *** [ClientDetailDialog.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/xmule-1.8.1/work/xmule-1.8.1/src'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Maybe you can come up with the ebuild and post it in bugs.gentoo.org. Thanks.



Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, April 10 @ 14:32:02 CDT
Let me tell ya all one thing. Until today I did not even know that there's something like 'aMule'. I gave it a try, and you know what? I had dozens of things hanging around in a queue for dl in xMule for months and they never started downloading. With aMule, in few hours, I got 'em all!
Just give it a though.



Nice release man !!! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, April 08 @ 03:51:09 CDT
I am very glad to see a new release !

The xMule is getting better and better !



Lazy Dropping Sources (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, April 08 @ 07:34:53 CDT
- Problem:

Dloads near to 0 most of the time, sometimes i can dload something but they use 30%-50% of the available bandwith, and not sustained.
Queue for popular files reaches max sources per file in a couple of hours, but most of them are in state 'unknown' and do not drop or change to another state.

Uploads reached max easily in 1.7.4c but not now, same behaviour than dloads.

Random crashes. Want me to paste backtraces?

- Configuration details:

AMD XP 2600, 512 MB , DSL 512/256kb
xmule 1.8.1 on Debian Unstable

HighID ,not doing NAT, fwall open for necessary ports.
Tired several servers with many users/files (razorback, probenprinz,...)
CPU usage, as promised in changelog, is very low.

Preferences in Source Dropping tab

Enable Auto Drop : checked
Extended Dropping : drop anyway
Full Queue : checked
High Queue : checked ; value : 1000
Auto Drop timer : 60

Preferences in Tweaks tab

New con / 5s : 40
Don't update queuelist in realtime: unchecked
File buffer size: 300000
Queue size : 6000

Preferences in Connection

Capacities : 40 / 10
Limit : 32 / 8
Max source p file : 700
Con limit : 1500





xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, April 08 @ 08:31:55 CDT
i tried to install this version on mac os 10.3.3 but it doesn't work.
i have lots of warnings and then this error :
ld: warning suggest use of -bind_at_load, as lazy binding may result in errors or different symbols being used
symbol _locale_charset used from dynamic library /sw/lib/libiconv.2.dylib(localcharset.o) not from earlier dynamic library /sw/lib/libintl.1.dylib(localcharset.lo)
ld: Undefined symbols:
wxAddProcessCallbackForPid(wxEndProcessData*, int)
make: *** [xmule] Error 1

heeelp ?!?
thx
raf



I complained but... (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, April 10 @ 18:21:49 CDT
1.8.0 was quite crappy, I already said that. I have not much trust in wxWidgets, I already said that... (yes, that's me...)
Well... That all said, I am truly positively impressed by 1.8.1. I have never downloaded so fast so many files (it's clearly faster than 1.7.4c that I just dropped this morning), and no more crashes ! Maybe, as some said, xMule 1.8.0 was a beta. Maybe. Now xMule 1.8.1 is by far the best file sharing tool under GNU/Linux.
Thank you guys.



Re: bug/leecher (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, April 08 @ 21:18:51 CDT
hello,

xMule 1.8.1 is my first version. i have a 2MBit SDSL and tried to upload at 190 kb/s. well, xMule can't handle it, it dropped 95% of the clients in my upload queue.... only 4 from over 250 uploads were succefull. :/

thank you



Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, April 08 @ 23:24:48 CDT
xmule is not good client.
For example, most of Emule (for win) and Amule (for linux, mac, beos) has "save source on disk".

Xmule still doesn't have it!

IMHO, amule has better GUI: percentage of download on every file on download window, better preferences window, etc




Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, April 09 @ 05:09:06 CDT
xMule is my first (ok second -- after MLDonkey, which interface i don't like) and last experience with ED2K. I love it. It works. The interface is clean and nice. I use it remote with X and it works flawless. I find things on ED2K which i don't find on Usenet and BitTorrent, which is awesome. For that, i have to thank you!

Right now i'm waiting for a deb for Debian GNU/Linux Sarge to try this release out. But i don't have any complaints about my current version, whatever version it is.



Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, April 12 @ 05:26:33 CDT
When I compile xmul1.8.1 I have this error :

BaseClient.cpp: Dans member function « bool CUpDownClient::TryToConnect(bool)
»:
BaseClient.cpp:861: pas de fonction concordante pour l'appel ? «wxIPV4address
::IPAddress()»
make[1]: *** [BaseClient.o] Erreur 1
make[1]: Quitte le r?pertoire `/tmp/xmule-1.8.1/src'
make: *** [all] Erreur 2



Re: xMule 1.8.1 Released! (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, April 12 @ 20:58:20 CDT
no upload after 20 hours -> leecher :/